Hitler’s Generals

Trump wishes he had them. I almost agree, but for different reasons.


Obligatory Disclaimer

The following is my opinion alone, not that of my employers or their clients and partners. If any of the sentiments expressed in this post offend you, my complaint hotline can be reached by phone at 1-800-B-DAMNED. Underpaid operators in the Global South are standing by, ready to summarily dismiss you!

Finally Shocked

I'm not used to being shocked by Donald Trump. He's never worked a day in his life. He's never created anything on his own. His idea of the value of money is that having means never having to say you're sorry. Having grown up in New York in the 1980s and 1990s, I knew even as a kid that Trump has always been an amoral and thoroughly venal asshole. The way he talked about the 1989 Central Park jogger case made it clear to me, even as a child of 11, that he was a man who did not think before speaking, wore his prejudices on his sleeve, and had no respect for the rule of law, due process, or any of the other institutions that give America what greatness it ever possessed.

That's why I didn't vote for him in 2016 or 2020, or in this year's election. Instead, I voted by mail the same straight blue ticket I've been voting since 1996.

Make no mistake about my motives: I don't vote blue because I agree with or like the Democratic party. They are not nearly as leftist as Republicans insist they are. They are the USA's true conservative party. They are only as liberal as Corporate America allows them to be. They are only as progressive as activists force them to be.

If "none of the above" was an option that actually counted for every office on every ballot, then that is how I would vote under the current two-party system, because while I dislike the Democratic party, I loathe the Republicans. To me, the Republicans are a coalition of fundies, fascists, and white supremacists. The average Republican's morality is that of a seventeenth-century Puritan fresh off the Mayflower: nothing but the relentless and unreasoning terror that somebody, somewhere, is having a good time without having first gotten permission from the church and state, and is doing so without having further enriched the already wealthy. Their arrested moral development — conventional at best by Lawrence Kohlberg's metric — is evidence of a congenital inability to mind one's own business. This is nowhere more evident than in the prurient obsession entirely too many Republicans have with policing other people's sex lives, particularly those of women and LGBT people. Their pretences toward libertarianism are those of people who are more interested in the privatization of tyranny for their own benefit than in its abolition for the common good.

Despite not being a Christian, I cannot in good conscience vote for such people, especially if they line up behind a demented old man who has already proven himself a traitor to this country's ideals and repeatedly violated his oath to preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States. These people are beneath contempt, and their morally and intellectually bankrupt ideology is founded on the double standard and the notion that might makes right. Their notions of political economy are those of a child who not only insists on playing the banker in every game of Monopoly, but cheats.

a tangent on policing sexuality and gender
a tangential note to evangelical Christians

Nor can I in good conscience vote third party or refuse to vote at all. Such actions help the Republicans more than they harm the Democrats. Voting third party — even though both the Green and Libertarian parties have positions closer to my own on many issues — is tantamount to voting Republican under the current system. Not voting at all is likewise tantamount to voting Republican; that's what these assholes want from citizens who oppose them, especially if their opposition is black.

Thus I hold my nose while voting, and wash my hands afterward while quoting that Scottish play. (Out, damned spot!) Given a choice between neoliberals (the Democratic party) and neo-Nazis (the Republican party), I will choose the neoliberals. I don't like Kamala Harris, but while she isn't without flaws, nobody has caught her on tape saying shit like I need the kind of generals that Hitler had.

Never mind that this sort of talk should be beyond the pale in the US, or that it should have been immediately reported and denounced as un-American. Never mind that this sort of talk betrays Trumps fundamental authoritarianism or proves the speaker unfit for any sort of public office in a country that claims to be either a democracy or a republic. This is one point on which I almost agree with Trump.

I almost wish that Trump had the kind of generals Hitler had, too. Many of them tried (and unfortunately failed) to assassinate Adolf Hitler. However, while I don't agree with most of what the US military has done overseas over the last century, I still think the vast majority of the US military's officer corps are men and women of integrity who honor their oaths to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

I'm not suggesting that Trump should be assassinated. It would be better if he were tried for treason, convicted, and condemened to spend the rest of his life in the United States' closest equivalent to the dungeons of the Chateau d'If, never to be seen or heard from again, and his corpse tossed in a dumpster. Nevertheless, if a general serving under Trump were to intrepret their oath to the Constitution in such a way that their conscience demanded they take a shot at Trump, I would not blame them.

Nor do I think Hitler is a good parallel for Trump. He's more of a Caligula. Trump is exactly the sort of person who would pimp out his sisters or appoint his horse to the Supreme Court if he thought he could get away with it.

This makes me wonder about the Secret Service's Presidential Protective Division. They're the closest thing the US has to a Praetorian Guard. Their duty is to the office of the President of the United States, not necessarily the man or woman holding the office. How egregious would a President's behavior or rhetoric have to get before a Secret Service agent assigned to protect the POTUS decides that they must commit treason for the good of the country?

It would be a good plot for a novel, but a fucking disaster if it happened in real life.

If Trump gets another term, I suspect it might happen if he goes far enough. I'd rather not see it happen, however, which is one reason I voted a straight Democratic ticket. Even if a Secret Service agent assassinated Trump for the good of the republic, they might end up doing more harm than good by making a martyr out of a moron — even if the moron is also a neo-Nazi in all but name.

Frankly, I think the ideal October Surprise this election would be for Trump to drop dead of a stroke while grabbing Laura Loomer by the pussy, and for JD Vance to get caught fucking Peter Thiel's couch while discussing the alleged merits of theocracy and autocracy with Curtis Yarvin. I'm not counting on any of that to happen, of course. It would involve the occurrence of the sort of miracle that would force me to reevaluate my atheism for the sake of what little intellectual integrity I possess. Admittedly, this isn't the first time that politics in the US has resembled an episode of the Jerry Springer show, but it hits different when you're there to see it happening live.

Memo to the Secret Service

I won't insult your intelligence by claiming that this entire post is a joke. Nevertheless, I'd like to make a few matters clear: